Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Mona Lisa Probably Would Have Enjoyed Beef Wellington: Cooking Shows and Art


MasterChef judges: Grumpy, Bipolar Bloak, and Obligatory "Nice" Judge

It’s no secret that summer provides a dearth of quality material for TV and movie fans. Save some exceptions (Breaking Bad season 4 premiered; if you’re not watching this show, continue not watching it because it gives me a reason to feel superior to you), summer blows. I’ve spent time in recent posts discussing bad film, so today I want to focus a little on summer TV, TV that is generally dominated by reality programming (well, so is the fall schedule, but just go with me).

Unless you want to watch re-runs of Fat White People Doing White People Things (some people call it Mike & Molly), you’re only TV choice is reality TV. My summer vice the last 2 years has been the Gordon Ramsay vehicle, MasterChef. FOX’s lead-in for this program is another more Ramsay-centric vehicle, Hell’s Kitchen. Though I have watched Hell’s before, the act of Ramsay yelling at people became more tired and contrived each season.

In MasterChef, Ramsay is significantly more subdued. Rather than playing the tyrant archetype that he does in Hell’s, MasterChef presents coiffed-haired Ramsay as a Brit who loves food but wanted something more than bangers and mash as a child. He is often compassionate and routinely encourages eliminated contestants to continue cooking. His role on MasterChef only serves to undermine his barbaric role on Hell’s Kitchen, underscoring the idea that Ramsay does have a heart after all. Some Ramsay irritation is funny, and MasterChef usually does an exemplary job of depicting their star as helpful mentor that only ventures into pissed off Scot when a contestant deserves it or the episode has hit an extended lull. As a result, MasterChef seems more serious or legitimate than its higher-rated counterpart (According to TVbythenumbers.com, Hell’s Kitchen scored first place for the 8:00 time slot yesterday with 5.77 million viewers while MasterChef came in 2nd in the 9:00 time slot with 5.35 million viewers, well behind America’s Got Talent. The more I watch America’s Got Talent, the more I think the show’s title should include a question mark; also, when I think of experts at evaluating talent, I think of Howie “I’m Talented Because I Used To Tell Hot Women To Open Briefcases In Prime Time” Mandel and Sharon Osbourne.).

The rise of reality food competitions has fascinated me for some time. One possibility is that my culinary expertise begins and ends with grilled cheese. Want me to use truffles with a dish? Then you’re getting piece of Lindors on a hot fudge sundae.

But the thing I find more curious with these shows is that they display a world most viewers will never realize. The contestants aren’t cooking pot roast or lasagna. Ingredients often include ingredients I’ve never heard of and I presume millions of other viewers haven’t either. And while I’ve heard of ginger, the extent of knowledge with ginger is limited to Canada Dry.

Additionally, cooking shows are more or less impossible for home viewers to judge. True, we can judge plating, but that’s only a small fraction of a dish’s importance. For food, taste is everything. Even if something doesn’t look visually appealing, it could be the most magnificent tasting dish ever created. And really, only the 3 judges will know how they taste. They can do their best to describe how “velvety” or “sensuous” a dish is, but those are simply adjectives used more to give the judges credibility than it is to relay to the audience the food’s quality. For the weak palated, velvety is a high class synonym for “good.”  

With American Idol and Dancing with the Stars, most people can infer whether the person singing or dancing did a good job. Even if you’re not a singing expert (I certainly am not), I can at least make a fairly educated decision as to who the superior performer is. With cooking shows, it’s a stab on the dark. We rely on sign posts like a judge’s facial expression, musical crescendos, and a contestant’s level of calm or confusion.

So I guess the question I’m getting at in a very roundabout way is simply…why? Why does MasterChef routinely accrue over 5 million viewers (in the black hole that is summer network TV no less)? Why is the Food Network no longer solely for lonely house wives? Why are Bobby Flay and Tom Colicchio and Gordon Ramsay not just respected chefs, but borderline A-List celebrities?

My theory is that cooking gives the audience what they perceive an ascertainable creative entry into high class art. The merits of food as art are certainly debatable, but for terms of discussion in this post, I’m on the assumption that in the proper setting, food is art. MasterChef thinks food is art. After all, part of the judging is based on the appeal of plating, and there is something to be said for the ability to create a tasty concoction on the fly. All the challenges on the show require contestants to, in usually an hour, make a dish with ingredients they may or may not have used before. It takes a specific creativity I lack.

However, cooking seems less of an innate skill than other forms of art, or at least that is an easy perception to make.  To a viewer, culinary art is nothing more than following a recipe. A little of this, and a little of that, and BAM!, you’re Wolfgang Puck. This is ignoring the fact that many great chefs go to culinary school and possess palates that can discern every ingredient in a soup. No amount of overused onomatopoeia can hide these realities. But people don’t see those realities, they only see what MasterChef presents to them, that being people heating up a bunch of ingredients in a pan and putting it on a plate.

With painting, people that are unable always scoff at the idea of painting. We’d be lucky to visit the Sistine Chapel, let alone paint God giving life to Adam on the ceiling, the visionary scope of which only a select few geniuses can even imagine.

Many feel the same way with singing (some should probably get that feeling more often) and filmmaking. For some, even coherent writing is a luxury reserved for the educated elite (especially snarky bloggers that like to poke fun at Shia LaBeouf and Diablo Cody). They are art forms whose production seems other worldly and thereby impossible to attain. And we’re ok with that. Even if I consider myself a reasonably good writer, I’m hyper-aware that guys like James Joyce and Phillip Roth are laughably more talented than me. Yet, it doesn’t bother me because those guys are in a rarified class that only a select few join.
Ok, but can he make corn beef and cabbage?

But cooking? Cooking is what our parents did every day when growing up (unless you’re Gilbert Grape). Cooking is so pervasive in our culture that all intimidation has worn off. We aren’t as impressed with Gordon Ramsay as we are with Martin Scorsese and Aretha Franklin because his art is the same thing our mom did daily, at least when we use the term “cooking” in its simplest form.

Reality cooking shows have gained popularity because they give us entry to the base level of the lifestyles of the rich, famous, and artistically talented. We might never party with Justin Timberlake, but we at least have the belief that we might be able to one day eat like him. Or if we want to accept the MasterChef allusion, maybe one day cook for him.

Thursday, July 7, 2011

The Chuck



When you’re a kid, there are few places more awesome than Chuck E. Cheese. The only thing that may surpass it is Disneyland, but even then, as a kid, I preferred to hang out with Mr. Cheese and friends. Nothing beats the combination of video games, unhealthy food, free sugar refills, and prizes which aren’t really prizes since you indirectly paid for them.

Having gone to a Chuck E. Cheese twice fairly recently for a kid’s birthday, the magic has obviously worn off. The place reeks of Pine Sol and stale tears. The games suck. Even the pizza, which I revered as a kid, now tastes like cardboard. And it got me thinking: maybe kids have outgrown Chuck E. Cheese. Yes, it’s obviously a kid’s place, but kids now are more sophisticated than 15 years ago. They aren’t satisfied that you can shoot into a basketball hoop for tickets (but wait! It can also move forwards and backwards! What fun!), tickets that will go to some piece of crap plastic whistle or, if they’re really lucky, a lava lamp. Kids now want video games and software for their computers and Apple money so they can buy apps on their IPads. Given how quickly kids seem to be growing up now, don’t be surprised if corn cobs pipes are included in future Happy Meals.

So, if the kids no longer appreciate Chuck E. Cheese, why not give it back to the young adults? The very one’s that grew up incessantly bothering their parents to take them to Chuck E. Cheese. My idea is to create a 21 and over club atmosphere based on Chuck E. Cheese, known simply as The Chuck.

My idea differs from Dave & Buster’s because D&B obviously wants to be different from Chuck E. Cheese. I don’t. I want to adopt all Chuck E. Cheese elements and put an adult spin on them with some minor tweaks. After all, Chuck E. Cheese is more club-ready than you probably realize.

Entrance

If you remember, Chuck E. Cheese already has a velvet rope upon entrance. This was to ensure that families would have a unique hand stamp so that upon exiting, children would leave with their parents and not be abducted by some weirdo (because, you know, it’s so much safer to be with your parents, as one recent verdict proved).

In The Chuck, I’m doing away with the hand stamps. Instead, patrons (if lucky enough to be on the list) will receive glow necklaces, with certain colors denoting how “available” they are. Blue means “Not Interested” because, as all female stand up comedians will attest, it’s annoying being hit on in clubs. Plus, this will prevent these “Not Interested” people from getting free drinks from sucker guys. See, I’m helping everyone.

Green necklaces can mean something like “It’s In Play, But You Gotta Work For It.” Red means you’re ready to go. By default, all male patrons receive red necklaces because no dude, if they’re being honest, wants to go to a club just to hang out or dance. They are on a primal mission. The necklaces could expedite the process.

Food

Trying to hook up can be a tiring venture (says the guy with less game than a 2011 Derek Jeter), to refuel, food is necessary. And yes, pizza is still on the menu. As is standard Chuck procedure, the now-bar is located immediately upon entrance. Here, patrons can order exotic thin crust pizzas. The Chuck will wisely add words to the pizza’s description like “basil,” “prosciutto,” and “margherita” so as to inflate prices. For dessert, patrons can purchase vodka infused cotton candy (I actually just made this up, but it sounds delicious; if it exists, I must find it*).



*7/11/2011 update: I was informed that this does exist. At AnQi Bistro in Costa Mesa, they serve a cocktail mixture of grapefruit juice, orange juice, vodka, and tequila, poured over a piece of pink cotton candy, called a Lotus. Or as the local "Real Housewives of OC" would call it, breakfast.

As far as booze, The Chuck will have an extensive bottled and draught beer selection. I would prefer to not have any cheap domestic beer, but since Bros will inevitably invade the club, they will need to keep hydrated with Bud Light (which reminds me, there will be a special Bro Menu; for a nominal fee, Bros can order a combo of cigarettes, Monster, and GED certificate of completion). Other than beer and the traditional drinks one can find at any bar, the Featured Drinks will be Suicide-infused. What I mean by this is that margaritas and other mixed drinks (for a small mark up) will feature every soda from the fountain, i.e. “suicide” (don’t pretend like you didn’t do this as a kid; one of the saddest days of my life was when Chuck E. Cheese stopped offering Surge).

Staff

Rather than having some doofus wearing a giant mouse costume or a purple Grimace-rip off, the staff will include scantily clad women (and men…I guess) known as the Mice. Think of it as the Playboy Bunnies, except the Mice won’t have annoying laughs and become famous for being “in love” with some 80 year-old that pretty much keeps Viagra in business by himself. As for the men on the staff…well this is my fantasy and I can exclude them. If you want to buy your own franchise and employ men on the staff, have at it.

Games

Skee-ball is out, mostly because I’m trying to not make an inappropriate joke by adding one letter. You know Whack-a-mole? Well try your hand at Whack-a-bro (it should be noted that the developers of this game also created a House of the Dead type game where the gamer walks around a club and shoots all the 50-year-old men wearing Ed Hardy shirts)! Another must arcade game is Michael Jackson’s Moonwalker, a real game from the late 80s in which you play as MJ and walk around rescuing children (I’m not making this up) and killing the bad guys through dance; also in the game is Bubbles, MJ’s famous pet chimp, who appears in each level and provides a power up if you catch him (seriously, I’m not making this up). This game has no relevant purpose to The Chuck, but it’s hilarious and would reflect on the childlike whimsy of Chuck E. Cheese.

I also have a version of the basketball game, called LeBron James 4th Quarter Corner, where you earn 30 points for missing shots and 150 points if you don’t shoot the ball at all. Air Hockey is replaced by a beer pong table (reserved by the Bros until the end of time). I’m also getting rid of the racing games in lieu of Mel Gibson’s DUI Prix. The winner of the race s whoever can most successfully get pulled over and verbally assault a police officer. Bonus points are awarded if you are able to run Kiefer Sutherland off the road.

Obstacle Course

Ball pit is out, Jacuzzi is in. May as well, since both are equally unsanitary. However, the tubes stay. Since The Chuck is destined to become an international hit, many celebs will try to crash the party. The tubes are more for functionality than recreation though. Whenever annoying reality TV stars like the Kardashians or cast of the Jersey Shore show up to The Chuck, the bouncers will escort them to the tubes, where they will more than likely get lost and be unable to find their way out.

Entertainment

Just like Chuck E. Cheese, there will be a separate room that features live music. The middle tables will be replaced with a dance floor and booths will surround the perimeter of the room, reserved only for those interested in bottle service. The music will vary. Some nights will feature rock-based groups while other nights may be more hip hop infused. Prestige is important to The Chuck, so only premium talent will be chosen to perform. Sorry Lil Wayne. Ideally, the show will start around 10pm, which gives plenty of time for the room to get a true feel of other LA-based venues, that being it will be so crowded you can’t pull out your cell phone without bumping into someone’s drink. The Chuck knows how to put on a show, so they will also make sure to turn the heat on so you get a good lather going. What’s that, you want obnoxiously loud music like other clubs? You mean you actually don’t want to communicate like a reasonable person for the next 3 hours because you can’t speak to someone 2 inches away, not that it would matter since you have probably developed a slight case of deafness? And you only want the main act to play two songs and play them very half-ass? Well at The Chuck, they got all that covered! Also, to enhance the show’s full sensory enjoyment, The Chuck has hired hard rock band Great White to oversee all pyrotechnic operations.

Prizes

Like Chuck E. Cheese, the last thing most patrons will do before exiting into the night is collecting their prizes. And, also like Chuck E. Cheese, the prizes are generally worth the time of standing in line. Patrons can turn in their tickets for a variety of prizes. If you are unable to win any prizes, don’t worry, there is a handful of free options, including a Blu-Ray box set of all of Katherine Heigl’s movies and a first generation Motorola Droid (seriously, mine sucks now, anyone want it?). Starting on the bottom level, for one ticket, you will get 4 tickets to an upcoming LA Dodger game. For 5 tickets, you receive a card with Matt Kemp’s sullen face on it, which requests that for only 5 cents a day, you can help pay his salary. After working your way through the higher levels with some BLOAQ stock and trips to Omaha, you start to get to the good stuff. For 1,000,000,0000,000,000 tickets, you inherit Oprah’s fortune (unfortunately, you also inherit her superiority complex).

And the most expensive item at the prize booth? Nostalgia. For an untold sum, a staff member of The Chuck will, for 8 hours, teleport you back to when you were 10 and you get to run rampant through Chuck E. Cheese as you remember it, before the smell of vomit bothered you and before you had a concept of money and before you developed a taste for superior pizza. For as awesome as The Chuck will be, it won’t be able to compare to your memories of Chuck E. Cheese, memories that with maturation are impossible to recreate. For 8 hours, you get to enjoy the place where a kid can be a kid.

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Maybe Optimus will Eat the Cole Slaw: People and Things Not Invited to My July 4 BBQ


                                         Nothing says freedom quite like this athlete perfecting his craft

Given the festive nature of this weekend, I decided I’m going to throw my first July 4th BBQ. Being the generous person I am, the guest list extensive. However, like all parties, there need to be limits to who exactly is invited. So, in case you were planning on coming to the party, here is a list of people and things not invited to my holiday bash.
The Maybe
Osama bin Laden
Osama is actually a “maybe” to the party. Before you boycott in protest, he’s only invited based on the premise that the winner of the Gandalf look-alike contest I held last year received an automatic invite to the party.
 He RSVPed months ago but I haven’t been able to get a hold of him for a couple months. But when he declared he was coming he said that he is a very busy man and that I would need to keep a left eye out for him. He also expressed great interest in going for a lengthy swim in my pool but also specifically requested no seals to be at the party. A bit eccentric, I’d say.
(too soon?)
The Hell No
Diablo Cody
Because I don’t have enough chlorine for the pool. A commenter on my last post suggested I just don’t understand her “free spirit” (then proceeded to say my humor was somewhere between Terri Schiavo and Andrew Dice Clay; I’m not even sure who they were trying to insult). When I first read the comment I thought, “wow, a strip club that gives away free spirits! What a happy hour!”
The No’s
Tracy Morgan
Because if my son was an unfunny comedian who perpetuates black stereotypes while by and large appearing in TV shows that appeal to white America, I might stab him to death.
Pledge of Allegiance Enthusiasts
Really…who cares? If you want to see a great example of the pledge’s waning power, go to any classroom around the country. Does it look like any of those kids care? The only ones that do care are the elementary school kids, but they’re excited to do it because they’re excited they remember it. In high school, when time for the pledge, everyone groans because they have to stand up and half-halfheartedly recite words that have been so ingratiated in us since we were 5 that any true meaning the pledge may have had has given way to redundancy. And just because someone is less than excited about the pledge doesn’t make them unpatriotic; contrarily, it could mean they are more patriotic because they realize their appreciation for America doesn’t lie in the banal words of a grammar school poem.
As for the “God” thing…who cares? If some people want to say it, then great. If some people don’t, whatever. It’s not like one of those “Oh well America was founded on Christianity” arguments because “God” wasn’t implemented until 1954, 62 years after the pledge was first adopted. If you identify America through God then good for you, but that is your right just as much as it is for an atheist person to separate God and America entirely. 

Cole Slaw
Whoever decided this should be associated with BBQ needs to be arrested for treason.
Optimus Prime
What am I supposed to feed it (him?)? It’s annoying enough having people request vegetarian options (at my house they get Pop-Tarts) but then there’s an 18-wheeler alien that I presume feasts on gasoline and oil. And, according to Eyewitness News, that is really expensive now. Plus, say he does come and accidentally knocks a barrel of oil into the pool…now I have a BP-type catastrophe on my hands. I just re-plastered and re-tiled the pool you idiot. I’m truly sorry your only friends are an illiterate Camaro and Michael Bay, I really am. But unless I need help destroying some Egyptian pyramids or the Eiffel Tower, I’m gonna have to ask you to leave.
Fake Freedom
July 4 is commonly known as Independence Day. This is, of course, the day Will Smith and Jeff Goldblum liberated America from British rule. The grand misconception is that on July 4, 1776, a bunch of our forefathers stood around a sweaty room and signed their name on the Declaration of Independence (John Hancock later stole the document and christened it the mission statement of his upstart insurance company), thereby making the American Colonies free. This belief is as heartwarming as it is silly. Being one for technicalities, America technically wasn’t free until the British surrendered to General Fresh Prince at the Battle of Yorktown in 1781. Making a political statement is fine and all, but had the British gone back and bitch-slapped the colonies after the Declaration of Independence was signed, that document would be about as meaningful as Frank McCourt’s bank statement (my inner Rick Reilly wrote that joke, not me). You really think King George III would have been like “crap, that territory is rightfully Britain’s, but those pesky colonists had to find the paper and pens and write their names. Well, I guess we can’t tax them now. Hey George 4, write down this new law I made: ‘no more complementary pencil boxes for colonists.’ Got it? Good. At least there is going to be a giant shipment of tea from Boston coming in today. Wait….”
I’m not going to complain too much about this. After all, we all get a day off every year due to this colonial pissing contest. So American Freedom, you are invited to my party, you’re just going to have to arrive 5 years younger.
LeBron James
Look, if I wanted someone to stand in the corner and not get involved in the action of the party, I would have invited Mike Huckabee.
Fireworks
I know, I know. Fireworks are one of THE staples of July 4. But I’m going to begin a new tradition of trying to exterminate them. Yeah, fireworks are cool, but then we invented this think called the television. All of a sudden, shooting rockets into the sky and blowing them up seems kind of boring.
Sure, fireworks are fun when you’re 10, but once you’ve seen one, you’ve seen ‘em all. There’s a reason the Chinese are running economic circles around us: nothing invented 1500 years ago is still impressing them (well, maybe snuffing out free speech; they can’t get enough of that).
Chiropractors especially love fireworks because millions of dads hold their children on their shoulders during firework shows, thus giving them neck and shoulder pain (tangent to the anonymous dads that hold kids on their shoulders during fireworks shows: trust me, we all know your kid is the greatest thing on earth and is destined to become the first U.S President that is also a star center fielder for the Yankees that does cancer research in their spare time, but please, there are other people trying to watch the show and your ice cream stained child is blocking the view. Plus, it’s not like they’re going to appreciate it. They’re about 25 minutes away from being cranky (after the ice cream sugar crash) and pissed off at you for not buying them that overpriced Buzz Lightyear doll; the nagging will in turn lead you get in a fight with your wife because you’re mad she didn’t have the car keys whipped out in 2 in seconds notice, meaning you have to hold your spoiled brat kid for an 5 extra seconds, then you complain about the traffic exiting the parking lot and how it was your wife’s fault because she suggested parking on the damn Goofy level when you knew Minnie would be better, but you decided you didn’t want to start anything that early in the morning because there was a long day ahead and you were just hoping your kid would make it through fireworks without sounding like a grizzly bear was gnawing their foot off. So the moral of the story: families shouldn’t go to Disneyland).
I really don’t have a rational argument against fireworks; they just bore me. I’m not a huge fan of choreographed shows. If the point of the day is to express American dominance (it is; that’s why the day is filled with gluttonous activities like watching baseball, drinking Budweiser, eating Hot Dogs, and lighting crap on fire, personal or property safety be damned…America! F*** Yeah!), then why not just light the whole box of fireworks at one time? The reason the British lost the Revolutionary War was because they didn’t have an answer for colonist guerrilla tactics. Our firework shows should have the same scatterbrained mentality. As General Fresh Prince’s brother in arms once said (may he RIP), it’s “time to kick the tires and light the fires!”
But until that day, I’m going to have to pass on fireworks.
Absolutely Invited
Column Gimmicks
This post speaks for itself.
Happy “Independence” Day everyone. Kick back, relax, and watch out for Decepticons. They’ll steal your money, laugh at you, and come back in 2 years to steal more of your money.

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Me Making Fun of Movies You Probably Like (With Pictures!)

Being that we’re in the midst of Superhero Summer at the movies, I thought it might be fun to take a look back at some popular movies, movies that you probably like, and make fun of them (without the aid of talking robots). One caveat is that the movies have to have a reputation for being good or are make so much flippin’ money they are impossible to ignore. Pretty simple.

And for anyone that follows my blog, you will notice I entered 2011 and introduced pictures to the post. So I want to thank Google Images for the assistance, a site that has helped me countless times; for example, I’m no longer curious to see Love and Other Drugs.

If you have any suggestions for popular movies that deserve attention in this blog or think I’m way off base, please input your opinion in the comment section. I plan on making this a fairly regular post (meaning “damn I’m running out of ideas already”). 

1. Juno

My first entry is Juno, a movie that so obviously wanted to be indie that it seemed cheesy. The biggest issue I had with the movie was the overhyped dialogue. Nobody, much less a 16 year-old girl that is dumb enough to get knocked up by Michael Cera (who I’m pretty sure is asexual), talks like Juno. The screenwriter, in case you are not aware, is a former stripper named Diablo Cody. No, seriously. She somehow won an Oscar for this movie, most likely because the Academy is mandated to dole out awards to “feel good” entries so often (unless there’s a Holocaust movie that year…those are first in the mandatory Oscar pecking order). Essentially the only thing I liked about that movie was Juno’s hamburger phone, but even that has lost some of its appeal because it is now available at Urban Outfitters.

(Tangent Alert: Hey Urban Outfitters, if you’re charging $75 for a shirt, how about at least not skimping on the interior design; no, the smell of lumber has never given anyone a fever to buy clothes and marked up copies of A Clockwork Orange).

                        "Hello? Hey, it’s Ellen – Trust me, I have no idea who Kimya Dawson is either"

Yet, this movie received rave reviews, from critics and the public alike. So the question is, am I wrong? The answer at the time was probably yes, but now that Cody has a track record of mediocrity, it’s looking like I was right all along. In 2009 Cody’s second feature was released, a true winner entitled Jennifer’s Body starring the immensely untalented Megan Fox. From what I gathered from the commercials, Fox is some sort of lesbian vampire that eats guys that want to sleep with her. Needless to say, the film was a critical and commercial flop. Cody should have learned her lesson from Juno, that Juno’s popularity was predicated on her being surrounded with talented people, such as director Jason Reitman and actress Ellen Page, who superbly sold the sham of a script. But you aren’t fooling me Cinnamon, er, Diablo. But hey, I guess making bad movies is better than giving the clap to business men at Spearmint Rhino on Wednesday afternoons. So kudos, you are the 21st century version of the American Dream.

2. Transformers, Revenge of Some Bad Robots that are Trying to Steal Some Oversized Lego so Sam has to Put Something in Optimus Prime’s Chest to Save the World, and, Oh Yeah, he Has to Yell “Bummmmmmmbbbbbbbllllleeeeeeeebeeeeeeeeeeeee” a Lot…Like, a Lot

Hmmmmm, too easy. Let’s try something slightly (emphasis on “slightly”) more challenging…

3. Untitled Shia LaBeouf Project

Which of these names does not belong: Harrison Ford, Tom Hanks, Tom Cruise, Shia LaBeouf.

These are names of some prominent actors in Steven Spielberg-involved projects. Hanks is arguably the best actor of his generation. Cruise, though a lunatic, is the definition of a movie star (especially in the 80s). He just has the look. After starring as iconic characters such as Han Solo and Indiana Jones, Ford has cemented himself as one of the best action stars in film history.

Then there’s Shia. He is none of what I just described, yet he is in seemingly every cash cow movie project there is. While Spielberg hasn’t directed Shia as often as the other actors (though he did in Indy 4: Attack of the Aztec Aliens), Shia has been in a number of projects executive produced by Spielberg (Eagle Eye, Transformers, and Disturbia, which I think is based on a Rihanna song).

If there’s a common thread in the above listed Shia-involved movies, it’s that there is nothing original about them. Indiana Jones and Transformers are well established tent pole franchises with no signs of stopping (the latter of which has dialogue that is so bad Diablo Cody would blush (that is, if she wasn’t already blushing while giving some guy – uh – never mind)). Disturbia was literally taken to court because it was believed to be a rip off of Alfred Hitchcock’s Rear Window. And Eagle Eye…well I’m too lazy to care about Eagle Eye. I’m sure the plot was “original” while still being formulaic enough to take a sucker’s money.

“But Andrew, Indiana Jones is also a franchise yet you don’t blame Harrison Ford,” said the hypothetical reader of this blog. “And Shia helped establish Transformers! Let me guess…you just hate Shia because he is young, rich, and attractive, similar to your Bruno Mars disdain. You’re such a biased tool.”

Fair points. First, Shia LaBeouf is weird looking. Second, Harrison Ford helped establish Indiana Jones with his ability to combine tough guy swagger with unending wit. For as much as Indy may have ridden the coattails of George Lucas’ favorite action films as a kid, that franchise is indebted to Ford (one alternative to Ford was Tom Selleck; yeah I just don’t see that working). As for Transformers, if anything, that movie was carried by Michael Bay and Megan Fox being sexy. You think if the movie was carried by Shia’s acting prowess, it would have given birth to 2 sequels in 4 years?

With Shia LaBeouf, really, take your pick. All of his movies are garbage and that trend doesn’t look to be slowing down (not that he cares; I mean, playing BioShock with Spielberg is pretty legit). When it comes to other prominent Spielberg pets, LaBeouf is clearly not even stevens. 

               You would have won money 10 years ago if you bet this guy would turn out to be an A-List action star

4. Titanic

Rose: “I’ll never let go Jack.”
Jack: “Brrrrrrrrrrrr”
Rose: “Whoops, there ya go. Sweet, now I get the whole door to myself without that plebian weighing me down.”

It’s basically Romeo and Juliet on a boat. However, this movie does deserve credit in two aspects. First, it helped launch the careers of two current Hollywood A-Listers: Billy Zane and Victor Garber. Second, 9 year-old me most likely appreciated the PG-13 nudity. It’s no coincidence I got really into drawing in 4th grade.

5. Godfather II

Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you my entry into the Most Overrated Movie of All Time Competition. Before you tear your shirts in anger, hear me out for a minute. On its own, it is a great film, better than 99% of anything coming out today. I have immense respect for Francis Ford Coppola; I think Godfather 1 and Apocalypse Now are two of the ten greatest movies ever made, and I wrote a paper about The Conversation during my last quarter in college (I got an A in case you were wondering; see, I do know what I’m doing sometimes). But GF2 is, speaking in terms relative to its predecessor, just ok. First of all, it’s not entirely a sequel. A solid third of it is a prequel, and an unnecessary one at that. Why should I still care about Vito Corleone, especially after he died in the tomato garden in the first one? I see that as lazy storytelling.


     You would have won money in the 70s if you bet this guy would be in a “Rocky & Bullwinkle” movie in 20 years


Second, I can’t believe a mafia movie set in Lake Tahoe. I just can’t. Where’s the conflict? “Oh, Michael’s Sea-Doo broke so now he’s going to whack someone; in fact, he saw Fredo screwing with the throttle so he’s going to send him on a fishing trip to hell.” Lake Tahoe is hardly gritty enough for crime. Trust me, I’ve been there several times. The closest thing to crime I’ve seen is a bear stealing trash outside my hotel window. Stick to New York, mafia movies.

Lastly, and this is more of a hindsight reason, GF2 was the origin of Scent of a Women and Heat Pacino, which is the Pacino that just mails in the performance, a-la LeBron James (probably a bad comparison because Pacino is still actually visible on screen), collects his money, and starts screaming for no apparent reason. Most Pacino movies I’ve seen after GF2 are like that. Sometimes it works (Dog Day Afternoon) and other times not so much (Two for the Money).

However, I must admit that I’m probably a moron on this entry. After all, I’m the guy that didn’t like GF1 or Pulp Fiction the first time but now I love them. So when I rewatch GF2 and love it, I will dutifully confess my sins.

***

A couple days ago I wasn’t planning on doing a special section like this.

But that was until I heard one of stars of Jackass', Ryan Dunn, died in a car accident.

Don’t worry, I’m not going to get weepy on you. This isn’t a tribute, per se. I wasn’t sad when hearing about Dunn’s death. I have no emotional attachment to him. I’ve merely seen his often hilarious antics from the Jackass archives.

Dunn wasn’t even one of the top 5 most famous cast members (trailing Knoxville, Pontius, Steve-O, Wee Man, Bam, and probably Bam’s parents), but his best known bit is among the most well-known Jackass stunts.

For anyone that cares about the future of movies (as I do), you are concerned with the endless remakes and sequels and general lack of ingenuity in Hollywood. It’s a pleasant surprise when something is original AND good. But it shouldn’t be. The fives movies I wrote about in this post made this list probably because I have issues with their versions of originality.

Say what you will about Jackass and Dunn, but taking a Hot Wheels car, putting it in a condom, then shoving said condom up one’s ass all for the sake of comedy is, if nothing else, pretty freaking original. Whether you want to read that stunt as a satire of media overexposure or read it as a disgusting, irresponsible act, it’s impossible to forget. And for anyone that cares about movies, that’s all we ask. We want to see something we’ve never seen on screen before, and we don’t want to forget it.

Jackass, with Dunn helping, accomplished that on a fairly regular basis. It’s been years since Jackass’ run on TV met its end, but those that grew up with it can still name off lists and lists of their favorite stunts. Stunts that were dangerous and pushed the boundaries of what TV and film can do.

Plus, Dunn’s stunt is something I would happily perform in lieu of watching a Shia LaBeouf movie.

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Goodbye, Columbus; or, A Dose of Reality for the Graduate in All of Us


I wrote this about a year ago, soon after my college graduation of June 2010 but didn’t really have a forum to post it. Believe it or not, I trimmed down the cynicism. So now it may look like I’m a pessimist, but at least it no longer looks like I’m beginning a transition to Goth (I don’t look good in black). Anyway, given it is graduation season, I felt now would be an appropriate time to post this. If ustedes (you’ll get the joke in a minute) have any good graduation stories of your own or would like to express things that annoy you about education in general, please share in the Comment section after the post.



If there’s one thing I learned in college, other than Queen Elizabeth I was a bigger bitch than she let on and 20th century authors proved greatly adept at suicide, it is that intelligence is currency.
For those that don’t know, I recently graduated from UCLA. Being a new grad, I am quickly learning that my proverbial meal ticket has just about expired. Previously, people would sort of worship the ground I stand on because I went to a well-known and well-desired institution. Now, though, the primary fascination with me isn’t where I earned my degree, but what I plan on doing with my life now that the pseudo-real world of school is over. While others go to school to become doctors or lawyers or teachers, I decided to major in English, which really means I majored in Poverty. I hate kids, so teaching is out of the question and, quite honestly, I don’t like working all that much.
But before I delve too much into myself, I want to return to my rather astute point regarding intellect being really valuable in college, or something. A great way to discover the intellectual requirement of certain social situations is the Movie Test. The Movie Test is quite simple: get comfortable with a group of people and start talking movies and get a feel for what types of movies said group enjoys; since everyone loves movies this shouldn’t be all that difficult to accomplish. A typical high school answer is probably as follows: “I don’t like any of that boring crap like There Was Blood or whatever the hell that one with the oil dude is called. It’s all about 300, Transformers, and those funny ass movies with Adam Sandler.” Now the uppity college response: “Well, lately I’ve been more into foreign or independent film. I find that film from Iran exposes problems that remain shockingly relevant in America. The shadowing and overall mis-en-scene give the films a truly noir texture. If I’m in more a light-hearted mood, I like to flick on the VHS (DVDs are fascist; screw the man, I’m not changing my format) and pop in some David Lynch or, if I’m really starved for something simple, Coen Brothers. Hey by the way there’s a rally this week supporting the three-toed sloth in the Amazon. Their habitat is falling apart because of...” You get the point. The high school student tells it like it is because their social status is not at stake based on their intelligence, whereas the college student is either BS-ing or a pretentious douche, both of which are acceptable at the college level. In college, especially at big universities, the need to feel important and smart is as vital as oxygen to humans, blood to vampires, and the souls of children for Nancy Pelosi. It is in college where one begins to feel their intellectual mortality, a feeling that heightens when one gets closer to graduation. The belief that you are normal and don’t really belong amongst your peers is psychologically damaging, hence the belief that one needs to lie about their cerebral powers or overachieve so that it becomes obvious to outsiders you matter.
Nowhere on the college scene is this radical overachievement more perceivable than the sheer, um, epicness of graduation ceremonies. My graduation experience, for optimum annoyance, was divided into two days. The first day of the celebration included just about every major. At this event, nobody receives diplomas. That is reserved for the satellite ceremonies, held either the day after or two days after the (I don’t even know what to call it so for the sake of ease…) Big Ceremony.
Big Ceremony kicks off with about 6 hours (numbers may be exaggerated; sorry, I’m not Charles Dickens so don’t expect a literary journey) of students filing into Drake Stadium on the Northwestern part of campus, cattle-like. In a sense, we are being lead into the slaughterhouse, only here we are fattened up on dreams and promises of great futures. I elect to enter with my friends from the Political Science department because English people are weird, not to mention some of the primary perpetrators of intelligence-related douchebaggery. After the bovinistic herd settles in their seats, the BC show officially begins with a tribute to John Wooden, legendary basketball coach that passed away a week before commencement. I’m sure the tribute is lovely, but I’m much too concerned with the colossal program, which includes names of all the graduates (Oh look! There’s me!), keynote speakers and most importantly the itinerary so we all know approximately the length of this thing.
After some generic graduation stuff, the student speaker, whose name I’ve since forgotten, delivers a rousing speech about how life after college is confusing, we should do what we want, and, oh yeah, support the federal Dream Act because this is absolutely my platform to express my political beliefs about current immigration policies. Following Generic Student Speaker is keynote speaker Gustavo Arellano (who?), “known” for his “Ask a Mexican” column in OC Weekly. Even though this sounds like a bad sketch from George Lopez’ talk show, Arellano delivered a rousing speech about how life after college is confusing, we should do what we want, and, oh yeah, let me refer to “you all” in the Spanish word “ustedes,” because this is absolutely my platform to express my political beliefs about current immigration policies.
After more talk about life after college being confusing, some important UCLA people begin announcing the different departments represented at BC. It becomes evident that after our specific department is called, we are supposed to stand/cheer/moo/hug friends/moo/wave to parents/adjust udders. During this procedure, I continually thumb through the program and look at names. It is here, on these sheets of paper, the notion of graduation becomes bizarre and slightly disturbing. For one, I see how extraordinarily ordinary I am. I didn’t graduate with Latin honors but can now clearly see how many people just in my alphabetic vicinity have some combination of summa or laude. Looking deeper, it becomes evident that UCLA could not give less of a crap about us. We are only good to them if we make timely payments for tuition and housing. This whole charade of graduating is itself a mockery. I just paid $26 for a flimsy cap and gown I’m going to toss when I get home. The festivities are, I suppose, the least the school could do for raising tuition and cutting classes. These actions are not necessarily the fault of the UC system; these problems stem from Sacramento. Nevertheless, as the cattle files out of Drake Stadium to greet enthusiastic parents, grandparents, and friends, one cannot help but wonder, “what’s the point? Great, now I get to enter a flailing job market and compete with these Summa Cum A-holes that are more driven than me.” Yet, by social standards, I need to become debt-ridden for the sake of a piece of paper that denotes I took enough credits without failing. And this piece of 8½ x 11 is going to get me places? Gustavo and Generic Student were right: life after college is confusing.
***
Remember when I was talking about intelligence being collegiate currency? Oh good, because there is nowhere I have felt as poor as the English Department’s commencement ceremony.
            Prior to the event, taking place on campus at the Los Angeles Tennis Center, the graduates line up on a smaller court adjacent to the actual venue. I arrive fairly close to the start of the commencement because, again, I don’t talk to English people and I don’t want to start now. It’s not that these people are mean; it’s just they think since they know what a spondee is and can describe Zora Neale Hurston’s use of free indirect discourse they feel they understand society’s emotional workings. A story near and dear to my heart took place in a Shakespeare class during my first quarter at UCLA. After reading Othello (or maybe Antony and Cleopatra; whatever, doesn’t matter) one girl raises her hand and declares that, after reading the play, “Shakespeare is truly a god among ants.” Here’s the kicker: nobody laughed in her face. In fact, I would bet my soul 95% of the class agreed with her. Shakespeare is a great writer and all, but a god? I prefer a great writer who plagiarized most of his material. Plus, Anne Hathaway (his wife) has been speculated to also be his cousin. Nice job Billy, you bagged your cousin and inspired the most overrated movie of the 1990s (Shakespeare in Love, which criminally defeated Saving Private Ryan and The Thin Red Line for Best Picture in 1998).  
            I understand the point the girl was making. While she said “Shakespeare is truly a god among ants,” she really meant “Hey everyone, I’m smart and complicated because I appreciate Shakespeare’s puns and I like to read 10 hours a day at Coffee Bean because I understand the voice of modern society is in books published over 100 years ago.” For anyone that majored in English, film, or other artsy things, they know these people. And if they don’t, then they were these people. The problem with encountering these people, in my case, is that they will not let me be as smart as them. Their lives are literature, while mine is more diverse; the only reason I majored in English is because I like reading in my free time and I’ve been told throughout my life I’m a good writer. That’s it. Unlike the chick in my Shakespeare class, I don’t really care what these authors have to say. I read, ponder for a couple minutes, then flick on Sportscenter. I don’t sit around thinking of crap to spew at the professor the next day. Their world, a world of “higher understanding,” is off-limits to me because I don’t put in the effort they do, effort I see as more or less pointless.
            Needless to say, I don’t want to associate myself with this girl and her kind. So as I enter the court to line up and wait to walk in the Tennis Center, I scout out a good safe spot. I line up in front of this guy with shades that I recognize from one of my classes. We don’t talk even though we are both obviously alone. It’s better that way. I don’t care about his plans after college and I would rather play Tetris on my phone anyway. Another advantage to planting myself next to him: I don’t look like a loser. As you have probably guessed, I’m worried about my perception to others, even around those obsessed with literary masturbation. Guy With Shades becomes my only option in my catch-22. I don’t want to talk to anyone, or look like a dork, which would happen if I stood next to some beret-wearing dude with a copy of Finnegan’s Wake. Guy With Shades is normal looking enough to where it is acceptable to stand next to him, alone.
Upon entering, I cannot help but feel like a Roman gladiator; the funny costumes we all wear and the screaming, almost rabid supporters create this allusion. Yet, it’s no allusion we pretty much are the evening’s entertainment. I half expect the Dean of English to show thumbs up or down as to whether we have truly earned our degrees.  The graduates, unlike gladiators, will not literally kill each other Russell Crowe style. Yet, the competition is clearly visible, even if the battle is undeclared. Students wearing different colored cords declare they received awards, recognition, or were just members of certain clubs. Battle garments. Even the shoes or tie one wears declare they are socially superior to others. I, naturally, fall somewhere in the middle (but at least I wasn’t the girl who forgot her gown, but was later rescued by her mom who gave it to an usher to give to her). I wear just a cap and gown. No medals, no awards. I’m not even wearing a tie. I feel the glares from my bloodthirsty rivals.
            After we arrive to our seats, we remain standing for the faculty, all of whom are dressed even stranger than us. All professors are dressed differently. There’s green gowns, orange gowns, funky octagon-ish hats and I think even one professor had a scepter. This is feeling less like a commencement ceremony and more like a wizard reunion.
            I recognize three of the professors and am disappointed when one of them isn’t Dumbledore. The first is Professor Little, a Shakespeare professor acting as the MC of the event. The other two are Professor Braunmuller (one of the leading Shakespeare scholars in the country, not to mention he could probably win a Mr. Magoo lookalike contest) and Professor Maniquis (Early Romantic Literature), who I can only describe as a man who looks like an Asian that looks like an Asian Powers Boothe. I’m pretty sure he’s not Asian, but still. A trend I notice during the ceremony is that Braunmuller and Maniquis, the latter following Jack Nicholson’s lead by wearing sunglasses at dusk/night, will lean over and whisper sweet nothings to each other almost constantly, nodding approval for those students they remember kissing their ass the past 4 years. Thumbs up.    
            It doesn’t take long to figure out if any of our speakers are good. I typically expect them to suck, since they mainly talk about themselves and waste twenty minutes, twenty minutes I may as well have spent reading their Wikipedia page. From my experiences, the only alternative commencement speakers to those that talk about themselves are the ones who say a bunch of banal phrases like “we can be whatever we want to be.” You know, stuff every kindergarten teacher says. Faculty speaker Professor Cunningham is this type of speaker. Although her speech was commonplace, she scored points in my book for possessing a voice that made me fall in love, love in the way somebody loves their grandmother. I secretly hoped she baked cookies for the graduates. She tells us just because we are English majors we can still become astronauts (Sally Ride) and governors (New York’s Mario Cuomo). She tells us we can do anything we want, but fails to mention that’s the case only if it’s outside the world of English. Professor Cunningham’s words are momentarily uplifting, until one realizes that Sally Ride double majored, also receiving a degree in physics, from Stanford no less. Meanwhile, Governor Cuomo received his law degree after his English degree. Her speech suggests that these professions, unlikely to attain anyway, are really only possible if you had some foresight and didn’t just plan on majoring in English.
As the ceremony lurches on, I receive texts from family to turn around, pose, wave, and overall just look stupid. Apparently, they are growing frustrated I didn’t instinctually do this in the first place. So, alas, I try to act excited, turn around, give them a few quick snapshots, then quickly about face and pseudo-listen to the proceedings while I read through the program for about the ninth time. By this point, the keynote speaker has taken the stage. Julie Corman, wife of famous film producer Roger Corman, gives us more hope and promises for bright futures. To be honest, I wasn’t really paying attention for her speech. I was either zoning out or wondering why Julie Corman, also a producer, was the keynote speaker. A quick look at her IMDb page makes it clear her work generally ends up on SyFy channel and only witnessed by shut-ins (though Dinoshark, a horror film about a, get this, prehistoric dinoshark killing tourists in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico after escaping from a melting Arctic glacier, is destined to go down as a classic of modern television).
Shortly after Mrs. Corman’s rousing speech, the ceremony finally turns toward the part when students walk on stage and receive their dip – er – nothing actually. The diploma is not mailed until UCLA makes sure classes are actually passed and, more importantly, all fees paid. Essentially, we wait around to hear someone pronounce, or mispronounce, our name.
            The procedure is simple: ushers silently inform us to line up on the perimeter of the stadium’s interior. Mercifully, there are two professors reading names, meaning we get to leave doubly quick. By now, all the parents are going crazy. This is the moments their Nikons and tripods have been waiting for. And just in case our parents proved worthless photographers, UCLA kindly provided three photographers at various points in the line, the last one as we shake a faculty member’s hand on stage (pictures can be purchased via internet for a nominal fee, of course). Waiting patiently for my row to be dubbed fit to graduate, I can’t help but notice the students that are called before me. A lineage of double majors, Latin honors, and graduating-with-honors tramples the stage in organized single file, allowing the stadium to hear their achievements. Some of those double majors come in fields like physics or math or stuff I can’t even pronounce. Those are the future Sally Rides of America. Those are the students that will grace headlines with their presence, that will make a difference in whatever field they choose or whatever Master’s program they enter.
After a seeming eternity, my name is called and I accomplish my goal of not falling on my ass walking across the stage. On the way back to my seat, I notice the happy faces on my family. Thumbs up. And don’t get me wrong, I am proud of the school I graduated from and the fact I graduated from college at all. It is not lost on me that most people never have the opportunity to go to college. For that, I’m truly lucky. But I liken myself a realist. Walking back to my seat, I see my gladiatorial competitors, those I will scrap and claw and contend with for similar jobs. Yet, they are equipped with swords and axes, whereas I possess a squirt gun, a degree with no extra successes or even an internship to hide behind. My hunt will not be hopeless, but it will be more strenuous.
            We all exit the stadium through a tunnel of faculty (I wished they had enclosed the tunnel with their arms and we got to run through, similar to how parents would do it after a soccer game when you’re 11), a nice touch so that we can thank professors we may have had a particularly close bond with. I bypass the professors and choose to wait for my family outside. I imagine the air would be cold if I wasn’t draped in Supreme Court attire. I spend five minutes waiting alone, waiting before my family moves with the crowd, cattle-like, out of the stadium. I relish those five minutes, because when they’re up, after receiving words of congratulations marking the official end of my life as a student, expectations change and being a full time student is no longer a viable excuse for not making something of one’s self.